order sildenafil discount
nav-left cat-right
cat-right

Apple to Provide Samsung with Copies of iPhone, iPad

Samsung Apple Requests

Samsung is actively responding to the legal action taken by Apple in order to protect their intellectual property.

Samsung has countered Apple’s action by filing a motion to see the final copies of the iPhone and iPad’s commercial version by June 13, 2011. Apple filed a patent suit against Samsung for allegedly copying Apple’s technology, user interface and innovative style, the look and feel of the iPhone, iPad and iPod touch. Samsung would like to take a look at the final version of the said products whether the product names will be iPhone 4S, iPhone 5 or any other name.

Samsung, in a statement, said the company is responding actively to the legal action taken by Apple against them in order to protect their intellectual property and to ensure continued innovation and growth in the mobile communications business. Their latest action is an answer to Apple’s motion for an apparently expedited discovery of Samsung’s yet to be released products. On Tuesday, a judge from a federal court in San Jose favored Apple and ordered Samsung to show its devices’ trial products in 30 days. The judge decided though that no Apple legal team or engineering personnel are allowed to have access to the devices but only outside counsel. The product samples Samsung has to provide are: Galaxy S2, Galaxy Tab 8.9, Galaxy Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, and 4G LTE Droid Charge.

Samsung has made internet reports and Apple’s previous practice as basis for its motion even if Apple is yet to announce iPhone’s new version. This makes Apple’s ‘expedited discovery’ motion different from Samsung’s in the sense that it only covered announced products. Should the final versions be unavailable by June 13, Samsung opts for the products’ most current version instead. The company said they would also obey the limitation set by Apple’s motion.

Samsung’s request to see Apple’s products is in line with their preparation for a possible motion for a preliminary injunction. Apple was said to have told Samsung that such action would be based on products they currently have in the market. Samsung said they need to be ready for the products that are actually available in the market when motion is filed by Apple as Apple habitually discontinues products after a new version is launched. Samsung said the appeal that Apple has to provide device prototypes for is fundamental fairness.

Apple and Samsung’s legal battle is critical considering the fact that Apple was Samsung’s 2010 2nd largest client, next to Sony. Apple represented $5.68 billion (4%) of Samsung’s $142 billion profit last year. Recently, Apple COO Tim Cook admitted that Samsung is still a valuable components supplier despite the suit. He said they felt the mobile communication division of Samsung had crossed the line, and after trying for some time to work out the issue, they decided they needed to rely on the courts.


  • higashi minami

    It seems or it could mean that APPLE is playing some other game in here… long time ago it fought Microsoft over the LOOK n FEEL of its products. ( 35 F.3d 1435 (9th Cir. 1994), now it seems that APPLE is going in a multiplayer battle that hurts also Google + Android, wrestling one of the 2 asian companies that provide memory and maybe display elements to them.  Hpe it does not plays a boxing match against Toshiba and Fosconn too.

    Apple has been criticized a lot lately, its restrictions on the Apple appstores, the because they were for the Ipad, the many things missing from the original Ipad itself, all the delicate problems surrounding its manufacturing in Asia, including suicides, and the toxic and suicides in the factories dedicated to produce the hardware in China:” in one incident in 2009, 49 Chinese workers for Apple were
    poisoned by n-hexane, a toxic chemical cleaning agent. After being
    hospitalized and left with “debilitating illnesses”Today august 23, Samsung provided images from the 60s movie 2001 space oddissey, where actors where shown working  on squared intelligent (cpued?) devices… so now Apple needs to explain if they travelled backward in time and designed or created tablets before Jobbie had  hair in a place different to its head. There is also some criticism or questions regarding  the elements supplied by Apple to the courts in Europe, included images of tablets or mobiles that are not even sold by Samsung in its Galaxy line, that could contain some editing or arrangement to make them appear as the same size of the Ipads, and worse. Apple need to shine on technology and “leaderism”, not in legal issues, because we love Apple creativity. Instead of spending money and time avoiding other companies introduction of products, it would be nice to have them building better gadgets. Does the Iphone 5 (and the Iphone “nano” some talk about) are the only ideas that Apple has on the table? I bought my 1st Apple II from a company that loved design and technology, I got my 1st Ipod and Macbook directly from the NYC store Sorry n Luv, Apple!